‹ BackNewsPrivate credit

Private credit

US Treasuries
2026-10-02 03:07:10

DCP says a Treasury reversal may need something to break before yields peak

U.S. Treasury yields moving above 5% have shifted the market debate away from whether the Federal Reserve will keep hiking and toward a harder question: what part of the economy or credit system will crack first under higher rates. In Forward Guidance’s latest Weekly Roundup, veteran rates and fixed-income trader DCP argued that the bond market’s turning point is less about whether the 10-year Treasury reaches 5.5% or 6% and more about whether elevated borrowing costs finally restrain AI-related capital spending, credit creation, and real-world demand. DCP said the current cycle looks different because large technology companies are still spending heavily on data centers, power, chips, and other AI infrastructure, even as tighter monetary policy tries to cool demand. He also argued that inflation is not being driven only by overheating demand. Energy, diesel, transport, and agricultural costs remain exposed to supply-side shocks that rate hikes cannot directly fix. In his view, the most important stress signals may emerge first in small businesses, commercial real estate, regional banks, and private credit rather than in large-cap tech stocks or headline equity indexes. He laid out several conditions that could support a bond-market turn, including a clearer end to Fed tightening, slower AI capex, easing energy pressure, a meaningful equity correction, weaker employment, or another shock that forces a repricing of policy expectations.

40
DCP says a Treasury reversal may need something to break before yields peak
PaleBlueDot AI seeks $600 million credit line for chip purchases in South Korea
Pendle’s Paolo RightSide says family offices are asking about moving capital on-chain as RWA yield expands beyond Treasuries
Tether
2026-09-29 01:36:00

Tether’s excess reserves halved in one quarter as StableFund launch draws fresh scrutiny

Tether’s reserve position and lending exposure are facing renewed scrutiny after the company and London-based asset manager Fasanara Capital announced StableFund, a private credit fund seeded with a combined $400 million and targeting up to $3 billion from third-party investors. Tether said it will help source USDT-related financing opportunities and provide stablecoin settlement infrastructure, but neither the launch statement nor later disclosures specified how much of the initial capital came from Tether. The timing matters because Tether’s June 30 reserve report showed total assets of about $187.75 billion against liabilities of roughly $183.64 billion, leaving $4.11 billion in excess reserves. That was down from $8.23 billion on March 31, a drop of $4.12 billion, or 50.1%, in a single quarter, while liabilities changed by only $106 million. The article points to declines in gold and Bitcoin prices as the main driver, and notes that Tether still held $13.45 billion in secured loans inside reserves. The report also places Tether’s structure against the backdrop of the U.S. GENIUS Act, which limits what qualifying payment stablecoin issuers can hold as reserves and restricts reserve reuse. With Tether also expanding lending-related activity outside StableFund, the next reserve report is expected to be closely watched for changes in excess reserves, secured loans, and whether any StableFund commitment appears inside reserve disclosures or only at the group level.

220
Tether’s excess reserves halved in one quarter as StableFund launch draws fresh scrutiny
F2 AI raises $5 million from Golub Capital in equity investment
Tenka raises $2 million in pre-seed round led by Maven 11
AI
2026-09-15 01:13:08

The Bigger Question in AI Spending Isn’t When the Bubble Bursts

Debate around a possible AI capital expenditure bubble has moved from tech circles into boardrooms, where executives are asking whether current spending levels are sustainable and what a reversal could mean for the broader economy. This article argues that trying to predict the timing of a bubble’s collapse is the wrong frame. A more useful line of inquiry is how the AI buildout affects economic activity, which transmission channels carry the greatest risk, and under what conditions a spending boom becomes a systemic crisis rather than a painful but contained correction. Using a narrower macro lens, the piece estimates AI-related capital spending at about $630 billion in 2026, just under 2% of U.S. GDP. After adjusting for imports, especially semiconductors, the direct boost to U.S. domestic activity falls to roughly $315 billion, or about 1% of GDP. Bloomberg consensus expectations cited in the article suggest that adjusted figure could rise to 1.5% of GDP by 2028. The article then examines three main risk channels: a halt in economic activity, negative wealth effects from equity declines, and tighter credit conditions if debt tied to the AI boom turns sour. Its central conclusion is that AI spending may still represent a manageable macro risk as long as losses do not severely damage the banking system. The article also argues that bubbles can leave durable economic benefits by financing infrastructure that outlives the speculative cycle, and it offers five practical takeaways for corporate managers operating through the current AI investment surge.

830
The Bigger Question in AI Spending Isn’t When the Bubble Bursts
BIS warns AI boom is masking leverage and hidden debt risks